Tuesday, June 4, 2013

We're trying an experiment...




For the next month or so, this blog will not be publishing anonymous comments.  Everyone must identify themselves (although you can use a pseudonym). This may make it more difficult for those who like to pretend to argue both sides of an issue and easier for those who want to respond to someone else's comment or question.  At the end of June the blog administrators will evaluate whether to continue the new policy or go back to allowing anonymous comments.

225 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   201 – 225 of 225
anonymous2 said...

Maybe Mary Lou Peryea should pay taxes so the poor Stonegate people don't

Taxpayer3 said...

If Mary Lou is renting then she is paying taxes in her rent since the landlord has to pay taxes on his property.

How much do you think the Stonegate people should pay? You pay what your house is assesd at always has been. When you live in a gated community and even if you are retired what makes you think you get a break? They can do what the board president did and take all the exceptions for the taxes.

newshound said...

beaconnews.suntimes.com/21306033-417/without-major-funding-east-high-plan-for-bold-change-in-limbo.html

knows131 said...

From the Beacon article about Stonegate:

"City officials pointed out that most of the reasons for the exponential jump in taxes in the subdivision were beyond the control of city government. They include the general recession and bursting of the real estate bubble that affected the entire country, the recently approved referendum that increased the East Aurora School District education tax levy, and housing problems peculiar to the city of Aurora as a whole."

What "recently approved referendum"? I vote in every election, and the last time I saw a referendum on the ballot was in 2008--almost 5 years ago. One reason it passed back then was all the public housing residents who showed up to vote in the presidential election, and while they were there they voted to help themselves to taxpayers' money THEY wouldn't have to pay.

oldtimer said...

About the district not getting the grant we were counting on: this has to be especially painful for those administrators (some of whom were excellent) who lost their positions or were "reassigned" in order to jump through the hoops required by the grant.

And the blog can say "I told you so", when this was the only place that brought out the REAL reason for the shake-up several weeks ago.

newshound said...

A link to Denise Crosby's article yesterday:

beaconnews.suntimes.com/news/crosby/21284719-418/news-keeps-popping-at-east-aurora.html

Knows131 better that "knows131" said...

Hey "Knows131" do you "know" that Stonegate isn't a part of district 131. They are a part of 204 - I guess you don't "know" all that much.

Go Away said...

Oldtimer - what are you talking about. The "blog" had the real story several weeks ago.

knows131 said...

Go ahead, see for yourself:

http://www.homesbymarco.com/subdivisions/4980/stonegate_west_in_aurora_il

Stonegate is IN FACT in District 131.

So the only thing you might know better than me is how to overuse quotation marks.

" :) "

oldtimer said...

I don't feel sorry for ALL the Stonegate residents. After all, both "Serial Bully" Radakovich and "Peyton Place" Postlewaite live/have lived there.

Yup Yup said...

CARILLON at Stonegate is in District 131.

STONEGATE is District 204. Big difference.

Nope Nope said...

No, you're mistaken. Stonegate West (the only Stonegate I could find listed in this area, although there is also a Stonegate subdivision in Joliet) is definitely in District 131:

activerain.com/blogsview/3517043/homes-for-sale-in-stonegate-west-aurora-illinois

Maybe you're thinking of Stonebridge, which is in D204.

newshound said...

beaconnews.suntimes.com/21356798-417/east-aurora-awards-52-million-food-services-contract.html

anonymous2 said...

Yeah,freaking hilarious. Even the alderman are missing inaction where was abby Schuler who is ward 1 alderman. She represents half of stonegate. Where was she? Ward 10 alderman was there. Referendum???? Oh yeah from 7 years ago. What a joke.

newshound said...

beaconnews.suntimes.com/21368419-417/new-director-of-secondary-education-student-services-for-east-aurora.html

What The ... said...

Oh great, it looks like our new director of secondary education (Michele Brown) was part of that whole Minooka crowd that came to Aurora with Dr. Radakovich and his ex-wife Kathryn Birkett. Was there anybody good that came from that group?

I'm also waiting for the lawsuit from somebody else who applied for the position, since our board president publicly announced that there was no real interview process, they knew who they were hiring before the process began. Annette's mouth really is a liability for the tax payers of this district.

just sayin' said...

http://www.wsbtv.com/news/news/local/federal-judge-approves-removal-dekalb-school-board/nWgfQ/

I wonder how this turned out at Supreme court level and if we could make this happen in EA. :)

give her a chance said...

What the..., just because Michele Brown used to work in Minooka does not necessarily mean she is friends with (or worked with) "Serial Bully" Radakovich. Radakovich left Minooka in 2001.

And Kathryn Birkett was NEVER part of the "Minooka crowd". The only connection she had was being married to the serial bully for awhile. Here's an article from the Chicago Tribune in 1996:

"Naperville — DuPage County's newest and most expensive high school has its first principal.

Kathryn Birkett, 39, has been named principal of Neuqua Valley High School, a $55 million school being built in Naperville. It will open in August 1997 to freshmen and sophomores.

Birkett, a 17-year veteran of District 204, has been principal of Steck School in Aurora since it opened in 1991. She taught physical education and coached girls volleyball and track at Waubonsie Valley High School in Aurora from 1979 to 1987, was Waubonsie Valley assistant principal from 1987 to 1991, then opened Steck School as principal.

As an assistant principal at Waubonsie Valley, Birkett hired and evaluated teachers, developed a staff mentoring program, handled student discipline and began student and staff recognition programs.

At Steck, Birkett started a staff committee for school improvement, staff development, technology, multicultural activities and student and staff recognition.

"I'm looking forward to the opportunity of working again with high school students, parents and staff to create a really positive environment and set a positive tone for educating kids," she said.

Birkett was reared in St. Charles. She holds a bachelor's degree from Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, with a double major in physical education and recreation, and a master's degree in education and administration from Northern Illinois University, DeKalb. She is working on a doctorate at Northern Illinois.

Her husband, Michael Radakovich, is superintendent of Minooka School District 111. They live in Channahon"

Kathryn Birkett has been an excellent administrator in D204 (I've lived in D204 for 15 years and my kids went to D204 schools). As far as her choice of husband was concerned, I've known many women who are great at their career but make poor decisions in their love life.

newshound said...

Here's a comment from the Beacon article:

"Suzanne Bement-Withrow has proven herself a worthy leader. Knowledgable and compassionate, she respects and supports teachers, staff, students and parents alike, works well with administrators, is excellent at conflict resolution, and maintains an even keel in rough waters. As a special education classroom teacher who has worked under her direct supervision, I am delighted to see her take the helm"

anonymous2 said...

The only one who should be removed from the the Board is Strand. her husband works for the district and is working behind everyone's back to help feather her own families nest.

auroramom said...

Actually, I think Kirsten Strand would make a good Board President.

The fact that she has kids in D131 schools and a spouse who works here means she has a vested interest in our district's success. It's one reason I voted for her.

anonymous2 said...

Strand has her own agenda.

oldtimer said...

...Which could be a GOOD thing.

I'd rather have board members who had agendas than rubber-stampers any day.

Duh said...

Ummm, I pretty sure every politician (or person who runs for office) has their own agenda. That is why they are running. You have to decide, as a voter, if their agenda works for you.

It's me. said...

Strand's agenda is to improve the lives and opportunities of the students in D131.

«Oldest ‹Older   201 – 225 of 225   Newer› Newest»